Multinationals: Lessons from McDonalds


In a recent post, I explained the problems in the search industry on international expansion. For instance, a UK vendor spent hundreds of thousands of dollars without signing a single US client, while a US vendor did the same thing in the UK. What gives? How do companies get it right? Let’s look no further than that iconic American hamburger vendor, McDonalds.

Look at the Big Tasty burger. Never heard of it? Just to to Brazil, Portugal or Italy to pick one up. It was dreamed up in a test kitchen in Germany and then tweaked, trialed and launched in Sweden in 2003, where it was a huge success. But to quote Fortune, the Big Tasty has become more than a giant burger: It is a prime example of how, in this era of global business, the tail can end up wagging the dog. 

Yet, as McDonalds has been discovering, running a successful global company requires some significant changes in corporate behavior. Going “glo-cal” as management consultants like to call it, requires striking a balance between managing a brand on a consistent basis and appealing to different tastes (culture) in dozens of markets. It means delegating authority and letting things happen; it is not a job for control freaks.

McDonalds also has clear rules on where the limits lie. Country managers can create their own campaigns but cannot fiddle with the logo.

As the article points out, this is not easy to do. What’s hard is creating a culture, corporate structure and work environment that fosters innovation whereever it takes place. “It takes a high degree of sophistication to do something like that.” says Till Vestering, who runs the Singapore office for Bain and Co.

Learn lessons wherever you can. You can learn a lot from a burger company.

What do you think? We love comments and re-Tweets.

Continue reading

The looming shakeout in search marketing business


If there is one thing I’ve learned in decades of business, it is this: 


There is no such thing as long-term easy money.

Let’s look at some past “sure things” — in which we were told the money was easy:

  1. “Housing prices are going to go up and up. You’ve got to buy ASAP.” (As recently as 2007)
  2. “Tech prices are going through the roof. Buy now or you’ll miss out.” (Late 1990′s)
  3. “Hedge funds are a license to manufacture money.” (Until this Spring)

Now I hear from CEO’s of search marketing firms “We’ve grown x hundreds of percentage points in the last three years. We’re doing great.” 

Well, I’ve got news for you — within three years eight out of ten of you will be bankrupt or purchased. While that seems dire, let’s look at the reality:

Easy money breeds competition just like food scraps draw ants. 

As I have observed, one cannot swing a cat today without hitting four or six search marketing firms. Picture a massive explosion of search vendors chasing a finite number of prospective customers.

Look at the naive marketing approaches of search marketing firms. Nearly all are run by technology geeks.  Browse through their websites and you will find they all say the very same things.  Almost all are very product centric — with “post and pray” websites and they hire “smile and dial” salespeople.   (See earlier post on why the founders sell and no one else can.  This is a symptom of bad management.)

Keep in mind that all of these search firms are calling the same prospects with the same product, product, product messaging.  Prospects are fed up. Something has GOT to give.

Someday, someone in the search marketing industry will awaken and say “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore.” 

They will focus on customer-centric marketing, business value and they’ll retrain all their salespeople. They’ll redo their websites and start tracking Digital Body Language. They’ll finally get “demand generation.”  

But the vast majority won’t and they’ll go the way of the dinosaur.

Good luck and good selling. http://www.jeffreyogden.com/